20-Oct-2015 12:08

Answers dating

Living organisms are constantly incorporating this C-14 into their bodies along with other carbon isotopes.When the organisms die, they stop incorporating new C-14, and the old C-14 starts to decay back into N-14 by emitting beta particles.

So, if we measure the rate of beta decay in an organic sample, we can calculate how old the sample is. Question: Kieth and Anderson radiocarbon-dated the shell of a living freshwater mussel and obtained an age of over two thousand years.ICR creationists claim that this discredits C-14 dating. Answer: It does discredit the C-14 dating of freshwater mussels, but that's about all.Kieth and Anderson show considerable evidence that the mussels acquired much of their carbon from the limestone of the waters they lived in and from some very old humus as well.Carbon from these sources is very low in C-14 because these sources are so old and have not been mixed with fresh carbon from the air.Thus, a freshly killed mussel has far less C-14 than a freshly killed something else, which is why the C-14 dating method makes freshwater mussels seem older than they really are.When dating wood there is no such problem because wood gets its carbon straight from the air, complete with a full dose of C-14.

The creationists who quote Kieth and Anderson never tell you this, however.

Question: A sample that is more than fifty thousand years old shouldn't have any measurable C-14. Radiocarbon dating doesn't work well on objects much older than twenty thousand years, because such objects have so little C-14 left that their beta radiation is swamped out by the background radiation of cosmic rays and potassium-40 (K-40) decay. this isotope [K-40] accounts for a large part of the normal background radiation that can be detected on the earth's surface" (p. This radiation cannot be totally eliminated from the laboratory, so one could probably get a "radiocarbon" date of fifty thousand years from a pure carbon-free piece of tin.

Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow.

Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years.

They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon (C-14) dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods.

This article will answer several of the most common creationist attacks on carbon-14 dating, using the question-answer format that has proved so useful to lecturers and debaters. Answer: Cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere are constantly converting the isotope nitrogen-14 (N-14) into carbon-14 (C-14 or radiocarbon).

Profile for answers dating:

answers dating-47answers dating-70answers dating-68

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “answers dating”

  1. Cyber Sites : Best Cyber Sex Sites-(theporndude.com)¦ — Webcam Champs-(webcamchamps.com) Adult Chat Rooms : Chat Room-chatbills.com¦ — Sex Chat Room-321Sexchatroom¦ — Adult Chat/(adult-chat.com)¦ — Free Sex Chat/(adultchat.net)¦ — Free Chat Rooms/(free-chat-rooms.net)Free Chat Room-Chit Chatting.com¦ — i Sexy Chat-(isexychat.com)¦ — Delhi Sex Chat-(delhisexchat.com) Sex Chat - freechatnow.com¦ — webcam sites-(webcamsites.com)¦ — Random Chat-(randomchat.com)¦Sexting Pages : Kik Sexting All these links are quality websites and following all google webmaster guidelines.